BE vs. PH: Bloom Energy vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Bloom Energy (BE) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BE is classified in Electrical Equipment while PH is classified in Machinery.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Bloom Energy (BE) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.61, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Parker-Hannifin (PH) is closer to market-like at 1.12 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Bloom Energy (BE) is heavily traded at around 15.48M shares per day, whereas Parker-Hannifin (PH) sees a more moderate 627.57K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Bloom Energy (BE) at 39.61% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

For every dollar of sales, both Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.53% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Both Bloom Energy (BE) at 18.49% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Bloom Energy (BE) at 37.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BE.

Only one side can be read here: Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports EPS growth of 5.01%, ranked against its industry; Bloom Energy (BE) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Bloom Energy (BE) at 3.74 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.42 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a yield of 0.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a payout of 26.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 104.99 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BE’s trailing earnings.

Both look expensive on sales: Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.37 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Both look rich against book: Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Bloom Energy (BE) at 26.49 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics