BE vs. NOC: Bloom Energy vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Bloom Energy (BE) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BE is classified in Electrical Equipment while NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Bloom Energy (BE) has a non-negative beta of 3.61.

Bloom Energy (BE) is heavily traded at around 15.48M shares per day, whereas Northrop Grumman (NOC) sees a more moderate 902.47K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Bloom Energy (BE) at 39.61% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.53% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Bloom Energy (BE) at 18.49% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Bloom Energy (BE) at 37.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BE.

Only one side can be read here: Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports EPS growth of 2.61%, ranked against its industry; Bloom Energy (BE) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Bloom Energy (BE) at 3.74 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.42 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a yield of 1.82%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a payout of 30.18%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 104.99 trades above its peer range — a wide earnings-valuation gap relative to industry peers.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.37 clears its benchmark range — BE looks notably rich on sales.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 26.49 prices above its benchmark range — BE looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics