BE vs. LMT: Bloom Energy vs. Lockheed Martin Stock Comparison
How do Bloom Energy (BE) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Bloom Energy (BE) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BE is classified in Electrical Equipment while LMT is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Bloom Energy Corp. Class A Common Stock | Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Heavy Electrical Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 51.20 billion USD | 131.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 25, 2018 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 46.07% | 31.17% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 162.89% | 12.79% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 41.93% | 14.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Bloom Energy (BE) has a highly aggressive beta of 3.61, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) is defensive at 0.10 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.
| Metric | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 112.64% | 31.09% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.61 | 0.10 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -74.98% | -31.79% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 15.48M | 1.29M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | 0.86 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.57 | 1.38 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 80.19% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Bloom Energy (BE) at 39.61% also sits in the top quartile.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
39.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- BE
- 39.61%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
80.19%
- LMT
- 80.19%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.53% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 8.23%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.53%
- Max
- 27.47%
- BE
- 13.53%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
8.23%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LMT
- 8.23%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 18.49% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 11.41%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
18.49%
- Max
- 36.60%
- BE
- 18.49%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
11.41%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LMT
- 11.41%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.61% | 80.19% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.45% | 8.58% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.53% | 8.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.49% | 11.41% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.77% | 11.73% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Bloom Energy (BE) at 37.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 5.64% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BE.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Lockheed Martin (LMT) reports EPS growth of -3.68%, ranked against its industry; Bloom Energy (BE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 37.33% | 5.64% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.06% | 4.38% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -3.68% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -0.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 3.74 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.26 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 5.22
- BE
- 3.74
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.26
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LMT
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.42 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.04 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 2.33
- BE
- 1.42
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.04
- Max
- 2.33
- LMT
- 2.04
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.74 | 1.26 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.42 | 2.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.50 | 1.47 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Lockheed Martin (LMT) reports a yield of 2.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.40%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LMT
- 2.40%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Lockheed Martin (LMT) reports a payout of 49.01%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
49.01%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LMT
- 49.01%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 49.01% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 20.14 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 104.99 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BE’s trailing earnings.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
104.99
- BE
- 104.99
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
20.14
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LMT
- 20.14
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.66 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.37 clears its benchmark range — BE looks notably rich on sales.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.37
- BE
- 13.37
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.66
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LMT
- 1.66
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Bloom Energy (BE) at 26.49 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 12.96 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
26.49
- BE
- 26.49
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
12.96
- LMT
- 12.96
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BE | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 104.99 | 20.14 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 13.37 | 1.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 26.49 | 12.96 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -0.00% | 4.31% |