BE vs. FER: Bloom Energy vs. Ferrovial Stock Comparison
How do Bloom Energy (BE) and Ferrovial (FER) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Bloom Energy (BE) and Ferrovial (FER) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BE is classified in Electrical Equipment while FER is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Bloom Energy Corp. Class A Common Stock | Ferrovial N.V. |
| Country/Region | United States | Netherlands |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Heavy Electrical Equipment | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 51.20 billion USD | 42.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | July 25, 2018 | August 13, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 46.07% | -1.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 162.89% | 26.01% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 41.93% | 17.20% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Bloom Energy (BE) has a highly aggressive beta of 3.61, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Ferrovial (FER) is defensive at 0.36 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.
| Metric | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 112.64% | 27.38% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.61 | 0.36 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -74.98% | -33.67% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 15.48M | 1.95M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | -0.20 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.57 | -0.30 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 39.61% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BE.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
39.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- BE
- 39.61%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FER
- 11.62%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.53% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.53%
- Max
- 27.47%
- BE
- 13.53%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.15%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FER
- 6.15%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 18.49% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
18.49%
- Max
- 36.60%
- BE
- 18.49%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
10.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- FER
- 10.45%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.61% | 11.62% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.45% | 2.62% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.53% | 6.15% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.49% | 10.45% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.77% | 87.14% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Bloom Energy (BE) at 37.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BE.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Ferrovial (FER) reports EPS growth of -72.26%, ranked against its industry; Bloom Energy (BE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 37.33% | 5.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.06% | 8.43% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -72.26% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 70.54% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 3.74 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 5.22
- BE
- 3.74
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- FER
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.42 and Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 2.33
- BE
- 1.42
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.44
- Max
- 2.33
- FER
- 1.44
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.74 | 1.20 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.44 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.50 | 4.39 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a yield of 0.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
0.94%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FER
- 0.94%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a payout of 71.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
71.24%
- FER
- 71.24%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 71.24% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 104.99 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BE’s trailing earnings.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
104.99
- BE
- 104.99
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
FER
Capital Goods industry group
32.26
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- FER
- 32.26
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on sales: Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.37 prices even higher, above its industry range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.37
- BE
- 13.37
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
FER
Capital Goods industry group
4.28
- Max
- 7.54
- FER
- 4.28
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Bloom Energy (BE) at 26.49 prices even higher, above its industry range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
26.49
- BE
- 26.49
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.59
- Max
- 9.66
- FER
- 6.59
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BE | FER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 104.99 | 32.26 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 13.37 | 4.28 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 26.49 | 6.59 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -0.00% | 2.11% |