BCS vs. WF: Barclays vs. Woori Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Barclays (BCS) and Woori Financial (WF) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Both Barclays (BCS) and Woori Financial (WF) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Barclays (BCS) trades around 4.89M shares per day on average, while Woori Financial (WF) sees only 85.96K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Barclays (BCS) at 10.45% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Woori Financial (WF) at 7.93% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Barclays (BCS) at 28.22% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Woori Financial (WF) at 27.06% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Woori Financial (WF) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Barclays (BCS) at 11.09% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Woori Financial (WF) at 5.30% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Barclays (BCS) at 21.55% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Woori Financial (WF) at 2.58% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Woori Financial (WF) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Woori Financial (WF) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Woori Financial (WF) at 1,108.19% yields beyond its industry’s entire range — a level that invites a dividend-safety check — while Barclays (BCS) at 0.50% sits in the bottom quartile of its peers.

Both Barclays (BCS) at 22.96% and Woori Financial (WF) at 32.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Barclays (BCS) at 8.33 and Woori Financial (WF) at 8.04 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Woori Financial (WF) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Relative to net asset value, both Barclays (BCS) at 0.88 and Woori Financial (WF) at 0.63 look inexpensive, sitting in the lower P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics