BCS vs. UMBF: Barclays vs. UMB Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Barclays (BCS) and UMB Financial (UMBF) both belong to the Banks industry, though BCS is classified under Diversified Banks while UMBF falls under Regional Banks.

UMB Financial (UMBF) trades as ordinary local shares, while Barclays (BCS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Barclays (BCS) at 10.45% and UMB Financial (UMBF) at 13.50% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

UMB Financial (UMBF) at 35.61% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Barclays (BCS) at 28.22%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Barclays (BCS) in Banks and UMB Financial (UMBF) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

UMB Financial (UMBF) at 65.66% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Barclays (BCS) at 11.09%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Barclays (BCS) at 21.55% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while UMB Financial (UMBF) at 3.34% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Barclays (BCS) in Banks and UMB Financial (UMBF) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Barclays (BCS) in Banks and UMB Financial (UMBF) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

UMB Financial (UMBF) at 1.33% pays a yield in its industry’s typical range, while Barclays (BCS) at 0.50% falls in the bottom quartile of its peers.

Barclays (BCS) at 22.96% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; UMB Financial (UMBF) at 13.54% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Barclays (BCS) at 8.33 and UMB Financial (UMBF) at 10.12 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Barclays (BCS) in Banks and UMB Financial (UMBF) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Barclays (BCS) at 0.88 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while UMB Financial (UMBF) at 1.34 is valued near its industry’s middle — BCS is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics