BCS vs. CM: Barclays vs. Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Barclays (BCS) and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Barclays (BCS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.58% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Barclays (BCS) at 10.45% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CM.

Both Barclays (BCS) at 28.22% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 33.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Barclays (BCS) at 11.09% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 13.66% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Barclays (BCS) at 21.55% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 17.72% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 3.62% offers top-quartile income, while Barclays (BCS) at 0.50% sits in the bottom quartile — a wide gap in cash returned to shareholders.

Both Barclays (BCS) at 22.96% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 40.12% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Barclays (BCS) at 8.33 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.32 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Barclays (BCS) at 0.88 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 2.24 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics