BAP vs. NU: Credicorp vs. Nu Holdings Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Credicorp (BAP) and Nu Holdings (NU) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Credicorp (BAP) has more than two decades of public-market history since October 25, 1995, whereas Nu Holdings (NU) listed on December 9, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Nu Holdings (NU) is heavily traded at around 80.53M shares per day, whereas Credicorp (BAP) sees a more moderate 316.59K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Credicorp (BAP) at 20.41% and Nu Holdings (NU) at 31.63% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.

Nu Holdings (NU) at 42.73% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Credicorp (BAP) at 33.10%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and Nu Holdings (NU) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Nu Holdings (NU) at 28.51% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Credicorp (BAP) at 11.57% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for NU.

Nu Holdings (NU) at 44.92% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Credicorp (BAP) at 26.04% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NU.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and Nu Holdings (NU) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and Nu Holdings (NU) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Nu Holdings (NU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Credicorp (BAP) reports a yield of 14.37%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Nu Holdings (NU) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Credicorp (BAP) reports a payout of 53.95%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Credicorp (BAP) at 13.10 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Nu Holdings (NU) at 16.48 sits in the richer quartile — NU needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and Nu Holdings (NU) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Measured against book value, both Credicorp (BAP) at 2.57 and Nu Holdings (NU) at 4.39 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics