BAM vs. TROW: Brookfield Asset Management vs. T. Rowe Price Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and T. Rowe Price (TROW) are both classified in the Asset Management & Custody Banks sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

T. Rowe Price (TROW) has more than two decades of public-market history since April 2, 1986, whereas Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) listed on December 1, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 42.29% sits in the top ROE quartile, while T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 18.20% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BAM.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 71.24% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 28.40% also retains a top-quartile share.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 65.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 38.60%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 15.52% and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 3.12% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 14.29% and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 0.98% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and T. Rowe Price (TROW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and T. Rowe Price (TROW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 4.76% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 0.83% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TROW the richer one.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 108.05%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile T. Rowe Price (TROW) reports 52.33%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 17.95 and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 10.97 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 3.00 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 12.75 clears its benchmark range — BAM looks notably rich on sales.

T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 2.03 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 7.19 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics