BAM vs. SYF: Brookfield Asset Management vs. Synchrony Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Synchrony Financial (SYF) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but BAM is classified in Capital Markets while SYF is classified in Consumer Finance.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 42.29% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 19.83% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BAM.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 71.24% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 34.07% also retains a top-quartile share.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 65.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 49.84%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 15.52% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) at -0.50% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 14.29% and Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 8.54% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Synchrony Financial (SYF) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Synchrony Financial (SYF) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 0.83% and Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 1.67% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 108.05%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Synchrony Financial (SYF) reports 12.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 7.70 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 17.95 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SYF, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 2.45 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 12.75 clears its benchmark range — BAM looks notably rich on sales.

Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 1.55 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 7.19 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics