BAM vs. NMR: Brookfield Asset Management vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Nomura (NMR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BAM is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while NMR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Nomura (NMR) has more than two decades of public-market history since December 17, 2001, whereas Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) listed on December 1, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 42.29% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BAM.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 71.24% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 65.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 24.36%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 15.52% and Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 14.29% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 0.83% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 108.05%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 17.95 and Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 12.75 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 7.19 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics