BAM vs. GPN: Brookfield Asset Management vs. Global Payments Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Global Payments (GPN) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but BAM is classified in Capital Markets while GPN is classified in Financial Services.

Global Payments (GPN) has more than two decades of public-market history since January 16, 2001, whereas Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) listed on December 1, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 42.29% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports 71.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 65.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 15.52% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 14.29% and Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 0.83% and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 108.05% and Global Payments (GPN) at 178.57% report payout ratio above 100%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings on both sides.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 17.95 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.

Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 12.75 clears its benchmark range — BAM looks notably rich on sales.

Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 7.19 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics