BAM vs. FIS: Brookfield Asset Management vs. Fidelity Natl Information Svcs Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but BAM is classified in Capital Markets while FIS is classified in Financial Services.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 20, 2001, whereas Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) listed on December 1, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 42.29% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 23.04% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 71.24% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 26.77% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 65.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 22.93%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 15.52% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.43% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 14.29% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at -72.03% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in Financial Services and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 0.83% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, FIS the richer one.

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 108.05%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) reports 25.71%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 4.29 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 17.95 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for FIS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 1.14 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 12.75 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 0.91 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at 7.19 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics