BAH vs. J: Booz Allen Hamilton vs. Jacobs Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J) are both classified in the Research & Consulting Services sub-industry within the broader Professional Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Profile Item	BAH	J
Name	Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock	Jacobs Solutions Inc.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Commercial & Professional Services	Commercial & Professional Services
GICS Industry	Professional Services	Professional Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Research & Consulting Services	Research & Consulting Services
Market Capitalization	10.16 billion USD	17.43 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 18, 2010	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BAH

GSPC

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Metric	BAH	J
Total Return (1Y)	2.63%	3.06%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	-9.38%	13.63%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	1.84%	6.41%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BAH

GSPC

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Metric	BAH	J
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	42.02%	34.18%
Beta (5Y)	0.29	0.68
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-66.59%	-34.44%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.79M	878.62K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

BAH and J are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Metric	BAH	J
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.04	-0.04
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.06	-0.05

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 70.00% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Jacobs (J) at 8.00%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

70.00%

BAH: 70.00%
Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.00%

Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
Median: 14.11%
J: 8.00%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 7.14% and Jacobs (J) at 2.38% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.14%

Max: 23.28%
Q3: 11.35%
BAH: 7.14%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.38%

Max: 23.28%
Q3: 11.35%
Median: 5.65%
J: 2.38%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.82% and Jacobs (J) at 7.39% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.82%

Max: 38.50%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
BAH: 8.82%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.39%

Max: 38.50%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
J: 7.39%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Metric	BAH	J
ROE (TTM)	70.00%	8.00%
ROA (TTM)	8.48%	4.55%
Net Margin (TTM)	7.14%	2.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)	8.82%	7.39%
Gross Margin (TTM)	22.58%	22.07%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Jacobs (J) at 4.60% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -6.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -4.83% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Jacobs (J) at -62.34% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Metric	BAH	J
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-6.37%	4.60%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	6.60%	7.13%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-4.83%	-62.34%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	50.35%	-21.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 1.44 and Jacobs (J) at 1.29 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.44

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
BAH: 1.44
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.45

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.29

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
J: 1.29
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.45

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but BAH is more stretched: Jacobs (J) at 1.25 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 3.78 is above its industry benchmark range.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.78

BAH: 3.78
Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.88
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.25

Max: 2.37
J: 1.25
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.88
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Metric	BAH	J
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.44	1.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	3.78	1.25
Net Debt / EBITDA	3.56	2.72

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 2.60% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Jacobs (J) at 0.92% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BAH the richer one.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.60%

Max: 4.33%
BAH: 2.60%
Q3: 1.80%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.92%

Max: 4.33%
Q3: 1.80%
J: 0.92%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 36.02% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Jacobs (J) at 45.18% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

36.02%

Max: 99.58%
Q3: 41.99%
BAH: 36.02%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

45.18%

Max: 99.58%
J: 45.18%
Q3: 41.99%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Metric	BAH	J
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.60%	0.92%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	36.02%	45.18%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 13.25 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Jacobs (J) at 49.47 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

13.25

Max: 49.47
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
BAH: 13.25
Min: 1.89

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

49.47

J: 49.47
Max: 49.47
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
Min: 1.89

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 0.93 and Jacobs (J) at 1.23 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
Median: 1.33
BAH: 0.93
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.23

Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
Median: 1.33
J: 1.23
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Jacobs (J) at 5.34 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.17 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAH is pricier on assets.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.17

Max: 11.25
BAH: 8.17
Q3: 6.08
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

J

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

5.34

Max: 11.25
Q3: 6.08
J: 5.34
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Jacobs (J): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Jacobs (J)
Metric	BAH	J
P/E Ratio (TTM)	13.25	49.47
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.93	1.23
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	8.17	5.34
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	7.76%	3.71%