ARCC vs. IBKR: Ares Capital vs. Interactive Brokers Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Ares Capital (ARCC) and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though ARCC is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while IBKR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) has an aggressive beta of 1.37, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Ares Capital (ARCC) is defensive at 0.59 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 23.67% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ares Capital (ARCC) at 6.19% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IBKR.

Ares Capital (ARCC) at 28.35% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 16.68%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Ares Capital (ARCC) at 72.74% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 77.70% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 9.73% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Ares Capital (ARCC) at -12.08% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Ares Capital (ARCC) at -23.77% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 28.14% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Ares Capital (ARCC) in Financial Services and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Ares Capital (ARCC) in Financial Services and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 0.46% pays an industry-typical yield; Ares Capital (ARCC) at 9.92% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Ares Capital (ARCC) reports payout ratio above 100% at 157.38%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Interactive Brokers (IBKR) reports 12.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Ares Capital (ARCC) at 15.68 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 28.94 sits in the richer quartile — IBKR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Ares Capital (ARCC) at 4.48 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 18.30 clears its benchmark range — IBKR looks notably rich on sales.

Ares Capital (ARCC) at 0.99 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 5.53 carries an above-peer premium to book — IBKR is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics