APP vs. PANW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and PANW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With APP at 121.26 billion USD and PANW at 120.01 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
APP’s beta of 2.39 points to much larger expected swings compared to PANW’s calmer 1.02, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | APP | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Nikesh Arora C.F.A. |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 181.26 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 120.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.39 | 1.02 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | July 20, 2012 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and PANW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APP and PANW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- PANW shows a negative forward PEG of -0.95, signaling expected earnings contraction, while APP at 2.43 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | APP | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 95.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | -0.95 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 14.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 18.74 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 40.33 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 78.26 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 13.85 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 39.88 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither APP nor PANW currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | APP | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and PANW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- PANW’s current ratio of 0.84 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas APP at 1.68 maintains healthy liquidity.
- APP is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.45), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while PANW at 0.14 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | APP | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.84 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.14 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.04 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | 591.06 |