APO vs. VIRT: Apollo Global Management vs. Virtu Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Virtu Financial (VIRT) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but APO is classified in Financial Services while VIRT is classified in Capital Markets.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Apollo Global Management (APO) has an aggressive beta of 1.47, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Virtu Financial (VIRT) is defensive at 0.69 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 57.03% delivers above-range ROE, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in profit generated from equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Virtu Financial (VIRT) reports 17.96%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Virtu Financial (VIRT) reports 36.32%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73% and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 26.25% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 72.73% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Virtu Financial (VIRT) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Virtu Financial (VIRT) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.87% and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 1.78% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 75.00% and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 15.95% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Virtu Financial (VIRT) trades at 7.92 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 and Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 3.35 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Virtu Financial (VIRT) at 1.92 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics