APO vs. RJF: Apollo Global Management vs. Raymond James Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but APO is classified in Financial Services while RJF is classified in Capital Markets.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 18.73% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Raymond James Financial (RJF) reports 14.97%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Raymond James Financial (RJF) reports 20.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Apollo Global Management (APO) reports revenue growth of 22.73%, ranked against its industry; Raymond James Financial (RJF) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 15.63% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Raymond James Financial (RJF) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Raymond James Financial (RJF) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Raymond James Financial (RJF) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a yield of 1.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 75.00% and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 18.48% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Raymond James Financial (RJF) trades at 13.67 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 1.98 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 2.46 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics