APO vs. PAYP: Apollo Global Management vs. PayPay Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and PayPay (PAYP) both belong to the Financial Services industry, though APO is classified under Diversified Financial Services while PAYP falls under Transaction & Payment Processing Services.

Apollo Global Management (APO) has been public since March 30, 2011 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while PayPay (PAYP) only listed on March 12, 2026 — long-window metrics on the PAYP side should be interpreted with caution.

Apollo Global Management (APO) trades as ordinary local shares, while PayPay (PAYP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Apollo Global Management (APO) has an aggressive beta of 1.47, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while PayPay (PAYP) is defensive at 0.24 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both APO and PAYP need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

PayPay (PAYP) at 18.80% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile PayPay (PAYP) reports 15.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile PayPay (PAYP) reports 32.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73% and PayPay (PAYP) at 25.85% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

PayPay (PAYP) at 230.06% delivers above-range EPS growth, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a yield of 1.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a payout of 75.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: PayPay (PAYP) trades at 23.30 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

PayPay (PAYP) at 0.02 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 prices around its industry’s middle — PAYP costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 and PayPay (PAYP) at 3.75 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics