APH vs. IONQ: Amphenol vs. IonQ Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Amphenol (APH) and IonQ (IONQ) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but APH is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components while IONQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

Amphenol (APH) has more than two decades of public-market history since November 8, 1991, whereas IonQ (IONQ) listed on January 4, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

IonQ (IONQ) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.33, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Amphenol (APH) is closer to market-like at 1.27 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Amphenol (APH) at 40.08% sits in the top ROE quartile, while IonQ (IONQ) at 6.90% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for APH.

IonQ (IONQ) at 67.09% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Amphenol (APH) at 17.95% also retains a top-quartile share.

IonQ (IONQ) reports a negative operating margin of -249.14%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports 29.68%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but IonQ (IONQ) at 201.85% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Amphenol (APH) at 51.71% also sits in the top quartile.

Only one side can be read here: Amphenol (APH) reports EPS growth of 73.96%, ranked against its industry; IonQ (IONQ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Amphenol (APH) at 1.94 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while IonQ (IONQ) at 4.24 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

IonQ (IONQ) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Amphenol (APH) at 1.03 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports a yield of 0.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports a payout of 21.74%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

IonQ (IONQ) at 18.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Amphenol (APH) at 32.43 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for IONQ, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Amphenol (APH) at 5.57 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while IonQ (IONQ) at 39.84 clears its benchmark range — IONQ looks notably rich on sales.

IonQ (IONQ) at 2.67 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Amphenol (APH) at 10.75 carries an above-peer premium to book — APH is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics