APA vs. CVE: APA vs. Cenovus Energy Stock Comparison
How do APA (APA) and Cenovus Energy (CVE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
APA (APA) and Cenovus Energy (CVE) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though APA is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while CVE falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
| Profile Item | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | APA Corporation | Cenovus Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 14.98 billion USD | 49.61 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 15, 1979 | November 17, 2009 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 92.90% | 60.99% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.25% | 19.41% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 11.68% | 18.63% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 44.92% | 37.47% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 0.43 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -70.47% | -53.51% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.66M | 6.90M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.97 | 1.51 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.94 | 2.20 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both APA (APA) at 33.32% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
APA
Energy industry group
33.32%
- Max
- 53.85%
- APA
- 33.32%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
APA (APA) at 23.49% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
APA
Energy industry group
23.49%
- Max
- 56.92%
- APA
- 23.49%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
APA (APA) at 44.25% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
APA
Energy industry group
44.25%
- Max
- 71.31%
- APA
- 44.25%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 33.32% | 27.44% |
| ROA (TTM) | 14.06% | 12.05% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 23.49% | 15.42% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.25% | 26.58% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 78.98% | 33.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both APA (APA) at -8.39% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
Both APA (APA) at 75.77% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.39% | -8.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -6.96% | -9.75% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 75.77% | 28.74% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -28.73% | -12.42% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while APA (APA) at 0.85 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for APA.
APA
Energy industry group
0.85
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- APA
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.24
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both APA (APA) at 0.42 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
APA
Energy industry group
0.42
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- APA
- 0.42
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.85 | 1.64 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.42 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.53 | 0.35 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both APA (APA) at 2.30% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
APA
Energy industry group
2.30%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- APA
- 2.30%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both APA (APA) at 16.26% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
APA
Energy industry group
16.26%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- APA
- 16.26%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.30% | 3.04% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.26% | 22.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
APA (APA) at 7.26 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for APA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
APA
Energy industry group
7.26
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- APA
- 7.26
- Min
- 2.99
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while APA (APA) at 1.62 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
APA
Energy industry group
1.62
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- APA
- 1.62
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both APA (APA) at 2.11 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
APA
Energy industry group
2.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- APA
- 2.11
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | APA | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 7.26 | 10.56 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.62 | 0.88 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.11 | 1.98 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 14.08% | 20.71% |