AMP vs. SF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMP and SF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AMP	SF
Company Name	Ameriprise Financial, Inc.	Stifel Financial Corp.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	47.64 billion USD	11.34 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	September 15, 2005	July 19, 1983
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMP and SF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMP vs. SF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AMP	SF
5-Day Price Return	-1.61%	-4.24%
13-Week Price Return	-3.22%	12.69%
26-Week Price Return	-6.36%	2.03%
52-Week Price Return	16.09%	29.66%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.47%	-2.74%
Year-to-Date Return	-5.08%	4.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.41M	0.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.46M	0.76M
3-Month Volatility	20.65%	22.46%
Beta	1.30	1.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMP

57.46%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

AMP’s Return on Equity of 57.46% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SF

10.91%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

SF’s Return on Equity of 10.91% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMP

17.74%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

AMP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SF

10.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, SF’s Net Profit Margin of 10.13% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMP

29.61%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

AMP’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.61% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SF

12.61%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

SF’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.61% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMP	SF
Return on Equity (TTM)	57.46%	10.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.76%	1.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	17.74%	10.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	29.61%	12.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	51.86%	98.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMP

0.62

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

SF

0.10

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMP

6.67

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

SF

5.52

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMP

5.46

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

SF

2.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMP	SF
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.62	0.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.62	0.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	6.67	5.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.46	2.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMP vs. SF: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMP vs. SF: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMP

1.22%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Yield of 1.22% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SF

2.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

SF’s Dividend Yield of 2.13% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMP

18.14%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.14% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SF

39.56%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

SF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.56% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMP	SF
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.22%	2.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	18.14%	39.56%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMP

14.81

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

AMP’s P/E Ratio of 14.81 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SF

18.61

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

SF’s P/E Ratio of 18.61 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMP

2.63

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

AMP’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SF

1.89

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, SF’s P/S Ratio of 1.89 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMP

8.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

AMP’s P/B Ratio of 8.36 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SF

1.91

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

SF’s P/B Ratio of 1.91 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMP vs. SF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMP	SF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	14.81	18.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.63	1.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	8.36	1.91
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	7.13	7.81