ALB vs. IAG: Albemarle vs. IAMGOLD Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and IAMGOLD (IAG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and IAMGOLD (IAG) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while IAG is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | IAMGOLD Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 10.63 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | July 15, 2003 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 53.79% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 103.91% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 44.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 64.39% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 1.33 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -73.58% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 5.11M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.77 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 1.17 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 34.91% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IAG.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
IAG
Materials industry group
34.91%
- Max
- 52.88%
- IAG
- 34.91%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 34.29% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
IAG
Materials industry group
34.29%
- Max
- 38.66%
- IAG
- 34.29%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 43.99% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
IAG
Materials industry group
43.99%
- Max
- 66.70%
- IAG
- 43.99%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 34.91% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 20.39% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 34.29% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 43.99% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 51.82% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 74.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: IAMGOLD (IAG) reports EPS growth of -24.00%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 74.70% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 43.83% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -24.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.41 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
IAG
Materials industry group
2.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- IAG
- 2.41
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 0.12 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
IAG
Materials industry group
0.12
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- IAG
- 0.12
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 2.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.12 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | -0.10 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Albemarle (ALB) reports a yield of 1.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IAG
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- IAG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Albemarle (ALB) reports a payout of 39.16%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IAG
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- IAG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 8.34 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for IAG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
IAG
Materials industry group
8.34
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- IAG
- 8.34
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.77 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
IAG
Materials industry group
2.77
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- IAG
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.30 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
IAG
Materials industry group
2.30
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- IAG
- 2.30
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 8.34 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 2.77 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 2.30 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 11.69% |