ALB vs. CRS: Albemarle vs. Carpenter Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Carpenter (CRS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Carpenter (CRS) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while CRS is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Carpenter Technology Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Steel |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 13.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | -8.47% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 66.22% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 56.37% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 49.01% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 1.39 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -55.01% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 913.10K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | -0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | -0.36 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Carpenter (CRS) at 27.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CRS.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
CRS
Materials industry group
27.84%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CRS
- 27.84%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Carpenter (CRS) at 17.87% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
CRS
Materials industry group
17.87%
- Max
- 38.66%
- CRS
- 17.87%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74% and Carpenter (CRS) at 24.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
CRS
Materials industry group
24.69%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CRS
- 24.69%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 27.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 12.96% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 17.87% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 24.69% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 31.22% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Carpenter (CRS) at 8.59% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Carpenter (CRS) reports EPS growth of 41.78%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 8.59% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 7.00% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 41.78% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 109.75% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Carpenter (CRS) at 3.94 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
CRS
Materials industry group
3.94
- Max
- 5.96
- CRS
- 3.94
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 and Carpenter (CRS) at 0.32 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
CRS
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CRS
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 3.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 0.62 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Carpenter (CRS) at 0.29% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CRS
Materials industry group
0.29%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- CRS
- 0.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Carpenter (CRS) at 7.05% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CRS
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- CRS
- 7.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 0.29% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 7.05% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 and Carpenter (CRS) at 24.54 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
CRS
Materials industry group
24.54
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- CRS
- 24.54
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and Carpenter (CRS) at 4.32 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
CRS
Materials industry group
4.32
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- CRS
- 4.32
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Carpenter (CRS) at 6.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — CRS is pricier on assets.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
CRS
Materials industry group
6.32
- Max
- 6.59
- CRS
- 6.32
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 24.54 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 4.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 6.32 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 1.54% |