AKAM vs. QNT: Akamai vs. Quantinuum Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Akamai (AKAM) and Quantinuum (QNT) both belong to the IT Services industry, though AKAM is classified under Internet Services & Infrastructure while QNT falls under IT Consulting & Other Services.

Akamai (AKAM) has been public since October 29, 1999, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Quantinuum (QNT) listed only on June 4, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative beta of -2.69, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Akamai (AKAM) has a non-negative beta of 0.69.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both AKAM and QNT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Akamai (AKAM) earns 7.85% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no ROE this period.

Both Akamai (AKAM) at 8.84% and Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.00% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative operating margin of -6,939.56%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Akamai (AKAM) reports 9.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Quantinuum (QNT) at 34.61% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Akamai (AKAM) at 5.44% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Akamai (AKAM) reports EPS growth of -6.12%, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Akamai (AKAM) at 2.13 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 15.49 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Akamai (AKAM) at 1.84 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Akamai (AKAM) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Akamai (AKAM) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Akamai (AKAM) trades at 32.33 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantinuum (QNT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Akamai (AKAM) at 2.72 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 441.11 clears its benchmark range — QNT looks notably rich on sales.

Akamai (AKAM) at 2.32 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 64.89 prices above its benchmark range — QNT looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics