Seek Returns

AFL vs. MRSH: Aflac vs. Marsh & McLennan Stock Comparison

How do Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) both belong to the Insurance industry, though AFL is classified under Life & Health Insurance while MRSH falls under Insurance Brokers.

Company profile comparison for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
Profile ItemAFLMRSH
NameAflac IncorporatedMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupInsuranceInsurance
GICS IndustryInsuranceInsurance
GICS Sub-IndustryLife & Health InsuranceInsurance Brokers
Market Capitalization61.36 billion USD97.39 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

AFL
MRSH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
MetricAFLMRSH
Total Return (1Y)12.21%16.87%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)18.21%3.11%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)20.06%6.23%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

AFL
MRSH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
MetricAFLMRSH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)17.13%26.15%
Beta (5Y)0.550.51
Max Drawdown (5Y)-19.86%-34.36%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.93M2.43M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
AFL and MRSH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
MetricAFLMRSH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.460.48
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.680.74

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 27.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Aflac (AFL) at 12.17% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MRSH.

AFL

Insurance industry group

12.17%

Max
41.68%
Q3
22.04%
Median
14.81%
AFL
12.17%
Q1
8.79%
Min
-10.66%

MRSH

Insurance industry group

27.24%

Max
41.68%
MRSH
27.24%
Q3
22.04%
Median
14.81%
Q1
8.79%
Min
-10.66%
Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their ROE against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Aflac (AFL) at 21.24% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 14.20%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

AFL

Insurance industry group

21.24%

Max
29.92%
AFL
21.24%
Q3
17.03%
Median
10.97%
Q1
6.21%
Min
-4.68%

MRSH

Insurance industry group

14.20%

Max
29.92%
Q3
17.03%
MRSH
14.20%
Median
10.97%
Q1
6.21%
Min
-4.68%
Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their net margin against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Aflac (AFL) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
MetricAFLMRSH
ROE (TTM)12.17%27.24%
ROA (TTM)2.39%7.35%
Net Margin (TTM)21.24%14.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)----
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 10.32% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Aflac (AFL) at -9.27% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 3.06% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Aflac (AFL) at -29.18% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
MetricAFLMRSH
Revenue Growth (YoY)-9.27%10.32%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-3.23%9.20%
EPS Growth (YoY)-29.18%3.06%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-0.53%11.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Aflac (AFL) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Aflac (AFL) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
MetricAFLMRSH
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Aflac (AFL) at 1.91% and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 1.80% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

AFL

Insurance industry group

1.91%

Max
5.12%
Q3
2.15%
AFL
1.91%
Median
0.98%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRSH

Insurance industry group

1.80%

Max
5.12%
Q3
2.15%
MRSH
1.80%
Median
0.98%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Aflac (AFL) at 35.18% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 44.14% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

AFL

Insurance industry group

35.18%

Max
76.67%
AFL
35.18%
Q3
35.18%
Median
14.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRSH

Insurance industry group

44.14%

Max
76.67%
MRSH
44.14%
Q3
35.18%
Median
14.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
MetricAFLMRSH
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.91%1.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.18%44.14%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Aflac (AFL) at 18.11 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 24.50 sits in the richer quartile — MRSH needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

AFL

Insurance industry group

18.11

Max
28.37
Q3
18.75
AFL
18.11
Median
12.23
Q1
9.08
Min
2.32

MRSH

Insurance industry group

24.50

Max
28.37
MRSH
24.50
Q3
18.75
Median
12.23
Q1
9.08
Min
2.32
Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Aflac (AFL) at 3.70 and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 3.42 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

AFL

Insurance industry group

3.70

Max
4.03
AFL
3.70
Q3
2.25
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.07

MRSH

Insurance industry group

3.42

Max
4.03
MRSH
3.42
Q3
2.25
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.07
Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Aflac (AFL) at 2.10 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 6.64 prices above its benchmark range — MRSH looks rich relative to book.

AFL

Insurance industry group

2.10

Max
5.07
Q3
2.79
AFL
2.10
Median
1.76
Q1
1.23
Min
0.30

MRSH

Insurance industry group

6.64

MRSH
6.64
Max
5.07
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
1.23
Min
0.30
Loading chart…
Aflac (AFL) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Aflac (AFL) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH)
MetricAFLMRSH
P/E Ratio (TTM)18.1124.50
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.703.42
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.106.64
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----