AES vs. SO: AES vs. Southern Company Stock Comparison
How do AES (AES) and Southern Company (SO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
AES (AES) and Southern Company (SO) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but AES is classified in Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers while SO is classified in Electric Utilities.
| Profile Item | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The AES Corporation | The Southern Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry Group | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry | Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers | Electric Utilities |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders | Electric Utilities |
| Market Capitalization | 10.61 billion USD | 107.51 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 26, 1991 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 10.79% | 6.21% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 3.44% | 15.28% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -5.12% | 12.24% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.19% | 17.95% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.30 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -63.43% | -23.28% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 8.50M | 6.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.26 | 0.11 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.33 | 0.16 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both AES (AES) at 8.68% and Southern Company (SO) at 11.90% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
AES
Utilities industry group
8.68%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- AES
- 8.68%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
SO
Utilities industry group
11.90%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- SO
- 11.90%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both AES (AES) at 13.16% and Southern Company (SO) at 16.00% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
AES
Utilities industry group
13.16%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- AES
- 13.16%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
SO
Utilities industry group
16.00%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- SO
- 16.00%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Southern Company (SO) at 36.92% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of AES (AES) at 23.89%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
AES
Utilities industry group
23.89%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- AES
- 23.89%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
SO
Utilities industry group
36.92%
- Max
- 53.83%
- SO
- 36.92%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 8.68% | 11.90% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.13% | 3.36% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.16% | 16.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.89% | 36.92% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 21.34% | 48.55% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Southern Company (SO) at 10.59% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while AES (AES) at -0.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Southern Company (SO) at -1.75% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while AES (AES) at -46.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.37% | 10.59% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.03% | 0.31% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -46.61% | -1.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 6.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both AES (AES) at 0.86 and Southern Company (SO) at 0.84 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
AES
Utilities industry group
0.86
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- AES
- 0.86
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
SO
Utilities industry group
0.84
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- SO
- 0.84
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Southern Company (SO) at 1.68 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while AES (AES) at 2.43 uses more debt funding than most peers.
AES
Utilities industry group
2.43
- Max
- 2.63
- AES
- 2.43
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
SO
Utilities industry group
1.68
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- SO
- 1.68
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.86 | 0.84 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.43 | 1.68 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.28 | 5.01 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
AES (AES) at 4.73% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Southern Company (SO) at 3.21% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, AES the richer one.
AES
Utilities industry group
4.73%
- Max
- 6.66%
- AES
- 4.73%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
SO
Utilities industry group
3.21%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- SO
- 3.21%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Southern Company (SO) at 68.49% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; AES (AES) at 28.27% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.
AES
Utilities industry group
28.27%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- AES
- 28.27%
- Min
- 0.00%
SO
Utilities industry group
68.49%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- SO
- 68.49%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.73% | 3.21% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.27% | 68.49% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
AES (AES) at 5.97 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Southern Company (SO) at 21.08 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for AES, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
AES
Utilities industry group
5.97
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- AES
- 5.97
- Min
- 3.34
SO
Utilities industry group
21.08
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- SO
- 21.08
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)
AES (AES) at 0.78 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Southern Company (SO) at 3.45 prices around its industry’s middle — AES costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
AES
Utilities industry group
0.78
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- AES
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.00
SO
Utilities industry group
3.45
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- SO
- 3.45
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
AES (AES) at 1.86 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Southern Company (SO) at 2.56 carries an above-peer premium to book — SO is pricier on assets.
AES
Utilities industry group
1.86
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- AES
- 1.86
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
SO
Utilities industry group
2.56
- Max
- 3.12
- SO
- 2.56
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AES | SO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 5.97 | 21.08 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 3.45 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.86 | 2.56 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -30.54% | -4.73% |