AES vs. PCG: AES vs. PG&E Stock Comparison
How do AES (AES) and PG&E (PCG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
AES (AES) and PG&E (PCG) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but AES is classified in Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers while PCG is classified in Electric Utilities.
| Profile Item | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The AES Corporation | PG&E Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry Group | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry | Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers | Electric Utilities |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders | Electric Utilities |
| Market Capitalization | 10.61 billion USD | 28.57 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 26, 1991 | June 1, 1972 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 10.79% | -19.03% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 3.44% | -6.50% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -5.12% | 2.05% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.19% | 34.84% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.17 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -63.43% | -43.92% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 8.50M | 39.33M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.26 | -0.67 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.33 | -0.81 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both AES (AES) at 8.68% and PG&E (PCG) at 8.89% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
AES
Utilities industry group
8.68%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- AES
- 8.68%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
PCG
Utilities industry group
8.89%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- PCG
- 8.89%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both AES (AES) at 13.16% and PG&E (PCG) at 11.57% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
AES
Utilities industry group
13.16%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- AES
- 13.16%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
PCG
Utilities industry group
11.57%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- PCG
- 11.57%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both AES (AES) at 23.89% and PG&E (PCG) at 23.64% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
AES
Utilities industry group
23.89%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- AES
- 23.89%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
PCG
Utilities industry group
23.64%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- PCG
- 23.64%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 8.68% | 8.89% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.13% | 2.59% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.16% | 11.57% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.89% | 23.64% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 21.34% | 40.57% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both AES (AES) at -0.37% and PG&E (PCG) at 2.11% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
PG&E (PCG) at 2.61% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while AES (AES) at -46.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.37% | 2.11% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.03% | 4.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -46.61% | 2.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 12.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both AES (AES) at 0.86 and PG&E (PCG) at 1.03 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
AES
Utilities industry group
0.86
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- AES
- 0.86
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
PCG
Utilities industry group
1.03
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- PCG
- 1.03
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both AES (AES) at 2.43 and PG&E (PCG) at 1.88 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.
AES
Utilities industry group
2.43
- Max
- 2.63
- AES
- 2.43
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
PCG
Utilities industry group
1.88
- Max
- 2.63
- PCG
- 1.88
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.86 | 1.03 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.43 | 1.88 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.28 | 6.05 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
AES (AES) at 4.73% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while PG&E (PCG) at 1.51% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, AES the richer one.
AES
Utilities industry group
4.73%
- Max
- 6.66%
- AES
- 4.73%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
PCG
Utilities industry group
1.51%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- PCG
- 1.51%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both AES (AES) at 28.27% and PG&E (PCG) at 14.81% pay out less of their earnings than their industries typically do, keeping retention high — common for businesses prioritizing reinvestment.
AES
Utilities industry group
28.27%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- AES
- 28.27%
- Min
- 0.00%
PCG
Utilities industry group
14.81%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- PCG
- 14.81%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.73% | 1.51% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.27% | 14.81% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both AES (AES) at 5.97 and PG&E (PCG) at 9.61 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.
AES
Utilities industry group
5.97
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- AES
- 5.97
- Min
- 3.34
PCG
Utilities industry group
9.61
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- PCG
- 9.61
- Min
- 3.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both AES (AES) at 0.78 and PG&E (PCG) at 1.11 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
AES
Utilities industry group
0.78
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- AES
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.00
PCG
Utilities industry group
1.11
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- PCG
- 1.11
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
PG&E (PCG) at 0.87 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while AES (AES) at 1.86 is valued near its industry’s middle — PCG is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
AES
Utilities industry group
1.86
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- AES
- 1.86
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
PCG
Utilities industry group
0.87
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- PCG
- 0.87
- Min
- 0.34
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AES | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 5.97 | 9.61 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 1.11 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.86 | 0.87 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -30.54% | -22.73% |