Seek Returns

AES vs. ED: AES vs. Consolidated Edison Stock Comparison

How do AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but AES is classified in Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers while ED is classified in Multi-Utilities.

Company profile comparison for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
Profile ItemAESED
NameThe AES CorporationConsolidated Edison Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS Industry GroupUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity ProducersMulti-Utilities
GICS Sub-IndustryIndependent Power Producers & Energy TradersMulti-Utilities
Market Capitalization10.61 billion USD44.00 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 26, 1991January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

AES
ED
GSPC
Loading price history…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
MetricAESED
Total Return (1Y)10.79%24.62%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)3.44%13.82%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-5.12%12.66%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

AES
ED
GSPC
Loading price history…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
MetricAESED
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)25.19%17.94%
Beta (5Y)0.930.23
Max Drawdown (5Y)-63.43%-22.03%
Avg. Volume (3M)8.50M2.21M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
AES and ED are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
MetricAESED
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.261.13
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.331.74

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both AES (AES) at 8.68% and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 9.10% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

AES

Utilities industry group

8.68%

Max
17.99%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
AES
8.68%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%

ED

Utilities industry group

9.10%

Max
17.99%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
ED
9.10%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their ROE against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both AES (AES) at 13.16% and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 12.70% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

AES

Utilities industry group

13.16%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
AES
13.16%
Median
12.73%
Q1
9.18%
Min
-0.20%

ED

Utilities industry group

12.70%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
ED
12.70%
Q1
9.18%
Min
-0.20%
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their net margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both AES (AES) at 23.89% and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 26.28% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

AES

Utilities industry group

23.89%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
AES
23.89%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
Min
-4.90%

ED

Utilities industry group

26.28%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
ED
26.28%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
Min
-4.90%
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their operating margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
MetricAESED
ROE (TTM)8.68%9.10%
ROA (TTM)3.13%3.33%
Net Margin (TTM)13.16%12.70%
Operating Margin (TTM)23.89%26.28%
Gross Margin (TTM)21.34%53.72%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 10.89% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while AES (AES) at -0.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 7.63% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while AES (AES) at -46.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
MetricAESED
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.37%10.89%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-1.03%2.59%
EPS Growth (YoY)-46.61%7.63%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)--6.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AES (AES) at 0.86 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.18 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

AES

Utilities industry group

0.86

Max
1.90
Q3
1.17
Median
0.88
AES
0.86
Q1
0.66
Min
0.29

ED

Utilities industry group

1.18

Max
1.90
ED
1.18
Q3
1.17
Median
0.88
Q1
0.66
Min
0.29
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their current ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.06 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while AES (AES) at 2.43 uses more debt funding than most peers.

AES

Utilities industry group

2.43

Max
2.63
AES
2.43
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00

ED

Utilities industry group

1.06

Max
2.63
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
ED
1.06
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
MetricAESED
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.861.18
Debt / Equity (MRQ)2.431.06
Net Debt / EBITDA7.284.42

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AES (AES) at 4.73% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.89% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, AES the richer one.

AES

Utilities industry group

4.73%

Max
6.66%
AES
4.73%
Q3
3.58%
Median
2.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

ED

Utilities industry group

2.89%

Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
ED
2.89%
Median
2.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 56.38% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; AES (AES) at 28.27% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.

AES

Utilities industry group

28.27%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
Median
56.38%
Q1
32.38%
AES
28.27%
Min
0.00%

ED

Utilities industry group

56.38%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
ED
56.38%
Median
56.38%
Q1
32.38%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
MetricAESED
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.73%2.89%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.27%56.38%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

AES (AES) at 5.97 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 19.03 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for AES, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

AES

Utilities industry group

5.97

Max
31.22
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
Q1
15.17
AES
5.97
Min
3.34

ED

Utilities industry group

19.03

Max
31.22
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
ED
19.03
Q1
15.17
Min
3.34
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

AES (AES) at 0.78 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.43 prices around its industry’s middle — AES costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

AES

Utilities industry group

0.78

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
Q1
1.52
AES
0.78
Min
0.00

ED

Utilities industry group

2.43

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
ED
2.43
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both AES (AES) at 1.86 and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.67 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

AES

Utilities industry group

1.86

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
AES
1.86
Median
1.83
Q1
1.46
Min
0.34

ED

Utilities industry group

1.67

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
Median
1.83
ED
1.67
Q1
1.46
Min
0.34
Loading chart…
AES (AES) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for AES (AES) and Consolidated Edison (ED)
MetricAESED
P/E Ratio (TTM)5.9719.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.782.43
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.861.67
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)-30.54%-3.05%