V vs. WF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 3, 2025

Here’s a clear look at V and WF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

V is a standard domestic listing, while WF trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	V	WF
Company Name	Visa Inc.	Woori Financial Group Inc.
Country	United States	South Korea
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Banks
Market Capitalization	654.82 billion USD	13.90 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 19, 2008	October 1, 2003
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of V and WF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

V vs. WF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	V	WF
5-Day Price Return	0.80%	-2.63%
13-Week Price Return	-3.85%	15.59%
26-Week Price Return	-0.81%	53.46%
52-Week Price Return	24.06%	5.12%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.96%	4.64%
Year-to-Date Return	8.02%	68.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume	7.83M	1.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume	6.38M	2.14M
3-Month Volatility	16.67%	33.67%
Beta	0.89	1.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

V

52.65%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

V’s Return on Equity of 52.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WF

8.49%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

WF’s Return on Equity of 8.49% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

V

52.16%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 52.16% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WF

19.91%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WF’s Net Profit Margin of 19.91% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

V

62.21%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

An Operating Profit Margin of 62.21% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WF

26.81%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

WF’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.81% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	V	WF
Return on Equity (TTM)	52.65%	8.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)	21.39%	0.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	52.16%	19.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	62.21%	26.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	80.23%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

V

1.12

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

WF

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

V

0.65

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

WF

2.50

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

V

24.71

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

WF

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	V	WF
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.12	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.06	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.65	2.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	24.71	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

V vs. WF: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

V vs. WF: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

V

0.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WF

4.71%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

WF’s Dividend Yield of 4.71% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

V

22.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.33% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WF

39.77%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

WF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.77% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	V	WF
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.68%	4.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	22.33%	39.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

V

32.84

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

A P/E Ratio of 32.84 places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WF

6.64

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WF’s P/E Ratio of 6.64 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

V

17.13

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

WF

0.62

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

V

17.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

At 17.81, V’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WF

0.48

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

WF’s P/B Ratio of 0.48 is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

V vs. WF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	V	WF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	32.84	6.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	17.13	0.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	17.81	0.48
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	30.17	11.33