TRV vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at TRV and WFC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
WFC stands out with 237.00 billion USD in market value—about 3.86× TRV’s market cap of 61.41 billion USD.
WFC carries a higher beta at 1.12, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while TRV remains steadier at 0.55.
| Symbol | TRV | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | The Travelers Companies, Inc. | Wells Fargo & Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Banks - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Alan David Schnitzer J.D. | Mr. Charles W. Scharf |
| Price | 271.04 USD | 72.83 USD |
| Market Cap | 61.41 billion USD | 237.00 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.55 | 1.12 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | November 17, 1975 | June 1, 1972 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of TRV and WFC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between TRV and WFC, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | TRV | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 14.40 | 11.95 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.31 | 2.98 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.18 | 1.32 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 6.84 | 57.48 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 4.74 | 30.41 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1.46 | 4.91 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 7.66 | 94.68 |
Dividend Comparison
Both TRV and WFC offer similar dividend yields (1.55% vs. 2.20%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | TRV | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.55% | 2.20% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of TRV and WFC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- WFC’s current ratio of 0.25 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas TRV at 26.20 maintains healthy liquidity.
- WFC posts a quick ratio of 0.25, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while TRV at 26.20 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | TRV | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 26.20 | 0.25 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 26.20 | 0.25 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.28 | 1.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 9.71 | 2.50 |