Seek Returns logo

TEAM vs. ZS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at TEAM and ZS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolTEAMZS
Company NameAtlassian CorporationZscaler, Inc.
CountryAustraliaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSoftware
Market Capitalization43.69 billion USD42.63 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 9, 2015March 16, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of TEAM and ZS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

TEAM vs. ZS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolTEAMZS
5-Day Price Return1.31%1.04%
13-Week Price Return-22.34%8.41%
26-Week Price Return-47.29%27.45%
52-Week Price Return4.75%40.05%
Month-to-Date Return-13.16%-4.12%
Year-to-Date Return-31.57%51.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.10M1.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.44M2.22M
3-Month Volatility42.58%33.64%
Beta0.971.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

TEAM

-20.69%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -20.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ZS

-2.54%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ZS has a negative Return on Equity of -2.54%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

TEAM

-4.92%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ZS

-1.52%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

ZS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.52%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

TEAM

-2.50%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.50%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ZS

-4.84%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

ZS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.84%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolTEAMZS
Return on Equity (TTM)-20.69%-2.54%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.59%-0.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-4.92%-1.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.50%-4.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.84%77.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TEAM

1.22

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZS

1.24

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ZS’s Current Ratio of 1.24 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

TEAM

0.73

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

TEAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZS

0.64

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

TEAM

-11.02

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

TEAM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ZS

-6.38

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

ZS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolTEAMZS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.24
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.171.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.730.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-11.02-6.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

TEAM vs. ZS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

TEAM vs. ZS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolTEAMZS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

TEAM

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for TEAM is currently unavailable.

ZS

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for ZS is currently unavailable.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

TEAM

8.38

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 8.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZS

17.53

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

ZS’s P/S Ratio of 17.53 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

TEAM

39.62

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 39.62, TEAM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZS

19.39

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ZS’s P/B Ratio of 19.39 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TEAM vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolTEAMZS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.3817.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)39.6219.39
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.8664.60