Seek Returns logo

SYM vs. TT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SYM and TT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSYMTT
Company NameSymbotic Inc.Trane Technologies plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryBuilding Products
Market Capitalization40.06 billion USD94.52 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 9, 2021March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SYM and TT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SYM vs. TT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSYMTT
5-Day Price Return25.86%0.67%
13-Week Price Return43.49%-2.26%
26-Week Price Return224.59%24.33%
52-Week Price Return194.19%9.78%
Month-to-Date Return25.86%0.67%
Year-to-Date Return186.12%15.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.15M1.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.26M1.27M
3-Month Volatility82.91%25.30%
Beta2.051.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.76% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSYMTT
Return on Equity (TTM)-7.69%37.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.88%13.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.71%13.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.20%18.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.30%36.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSYMTT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.081.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.900.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

SYM vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SYM vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSYMTT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%27.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

TT

33.20

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

A P/E Ratio of 33.20 places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SYM

18.17

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 18.17, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TT

4.57

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.57 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

At 12.45, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SYM vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSYMTT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--33.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)18.174.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)108.6912.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)83.4233.72