Seek Returns logo

STLA vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at STLA and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSTLASW
Company NameStellantis N.V.Smurfit Westrock Plc
CountryNetherlandsIreland
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryAutomobilesContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization31.17 billion USD21.05 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 9, 2010June 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of STLA and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

STLA vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSTLASW
5-Day Price Return12.91%-5.31%
13-Week Price Return5.21%-13.94%
26-Week Price Return-12.10%-11.64%
52-Week Price Return-24.28%-13.55%
Month-to-Date Return14.70%-5.31%
Year-to-Date Return-28.36%-25.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume31.01M3.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.72M3.96M
3-Month Volatility47.95%30.74%
Beta1.561.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

STLA

-3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

STLA has a negative Return on Equity of -3.09%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

SW’s Return on Equity of 2.94% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

STLA

-1.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

STLA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

STLA

-3.88%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

STLA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.88%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSTLASW
Return on Equity (TTM)-3.09%2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)-1.17%1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.64%1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-3.88%4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.74%19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

1.06

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

STLA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

0.56

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

STLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

STLA

37.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

STLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.73 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSTLASW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.750.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.560.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)37.732.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

STLA vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

STLA vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

STLA

5.80%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.80%, STLA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SW

3.65%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.65% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

STLA

82.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

STLA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 82.70% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSTLASW
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.80%3.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)82.70%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

STLA

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

P/E Ratio data for STLA is currently unavailable.

SW

39.96

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

At 39.96, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

STLA

0.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, STLA’s P/S Ratio of 0.23 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SW

0.47

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.47 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

0.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

STLA’s P/B Ratio of 0.34 is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

STLA vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSTLASW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--39.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.230.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.341.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.7940.43