Seek Returns

SNA vs. VRT: Snap-on vs. Vertiv Stock Comparison

How do Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but SNA is classified in Machinery while VRT is classified in Electrical Equipment.

Company profile comparison for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
Profile ItemSNAVRT
NameSnap-on IncorporatedVertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryElectrical Equipment
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsElectrical Components & Equipment
Market Capitalization18.94 billion USD70.41 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973August 2, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

SNA
VRT
GSPC
Loading price history…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
MetricSNAVRT
Total Return (1Y)12.48%11.12%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)15.36%71.14%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.84%49.38%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

SNA
VRT
GSPC
Loading price history…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Vertiv (VRT) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.15, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Snap-on (SNA) is closer to market-like at 0.73 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk profile metrics for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
MetricSNAVRT
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)19.41%71.11%
Beta (5Y)0.732.15
Max Drawdown (5Y)-20.77%-69.52%
Avg. Volume (3M)333.56K5.90M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
SNA and VRT are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
MetricSNAVRT
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.420.10
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.630.14

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Vertiv (VRT) at 46.57% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Snap-on (SNA) at 17.32%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

17.32%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
SNA
17.32%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

46.57%

VRT
46.57%
Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Snap-on (SNA) at 19.21% and Vertiv (VRT) at 16.00% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

19.21%

Max
27.47%
SNA
19.21%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

16.00%

Max
27.47%
VRT
16.00%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Snap-on (SNA) at 24.88% and Vertiv (VRT) at 23.77% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

24.88%

Max
36.60%
SNA
24.88%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

23.77%

Max
36.60%
VRT
23.77%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
MetricSNAVRT
ROE (TTM)17.32%46.57%
ROA (TTM)9.70%11.94%
Net Margin (TTM)19.21%16.00%
Operating Margin (TTM)24.88%23.77%
Gross Margin (TTM)51.87%38.12%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Vertiv (VRT) at 27.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Snap-on (SNA) at 0.93% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Vertiv (VRT) at 166.41% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Snap-on (SNA) at -1.64%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
MetricSNAVRT
Revenue Growth (YoY)0.93%27.69%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)2.11%21.59%
EPS Growth (YoY)-1.64%166.41%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)4.49%340.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Snap-on (SNA) at 3.55 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Vertiv (VRT) at 1.39 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.55

Max
5.22
SNA
3.55
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

1.39

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
VRT
1.39
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Snap-on (SNA) at 0.21 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Vertiv (VRT) at 0.61 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

0.21

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
SNA
0.21
Min
0.00

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

0.61

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
VRT
0.61
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
MetricSNAVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.551.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.210.61
Net Debt / EBITDA-0.26-0.11

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Snap-on (SNA) at 2.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Vertiv (VRT) at 0.11% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, SNA the richer one.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

2.66%

SNA
2.66%
Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

0.11%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
VRT
0.11%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Vertiv (VRT) at 4.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Snap-on (SNA) at 50.70% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

50.70%

Max
67.39%
SNA
50.70%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

4.67%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
VRT
4.67%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
MetricSNAVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.66%0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.70%4.67%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Snap-on (SNA) at 19.08 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Vertiv (VRT) at 34.18 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SNA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

19.08

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
SNA
19.08
Min
3.03

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

34.18

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
VRT
34.18
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Snap-on (SNA) at 3.60 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 5.37 sits in the pricier quartile — VRT costs more per dollar of sales.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.60

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
SNA
3.60
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

5.37

Max
7.54
VRT
5.37
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Snap-on (SNA) at 3.11 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 12.80 prices above its benchmark range — VRT looks rich relative to book.

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.11

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
SNA
3.11
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

12.80

VRT
12.80
Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Snap-on (SNA) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Snap-on (SNA) and Vertiv (VRT)
MetricSNAVRT
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.0834.18
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.605.37
P/B Ratio (MRQ)3.1112.80
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)5.77%4.21%