Seek Returns logo

SNA vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SNA and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSNAVRT
Company NameSnap-on IncorporatedVertiv Holdings Co
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization17.22 billion USD49.38 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973August 2, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SNA and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SNA vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSNAVRT
5-Day Price Return2.75%2.16%
13-Week Price Return1.37%17.78%
26-Week Price Return-1.69%34.71%
52-Week Price Return16.69%65.65%
Month-to-Date Return2.81%-11.19%
Year-to-Date Return-2.73%13.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.24M5.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M7.48M
3-Month Volatility24.09%40.17%
Beta0.791.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SNA

18.10%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SNA’s Return on Equity of 18.10% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SNA

19.72%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.72% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SNA

25.57%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.57% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSNAVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)18.10%32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.45%8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.72%8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.57%13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.96%35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SNA

4.48

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SNA’s Current Ratio of 4.48 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SNA

0.21

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SNA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SNA

65.15

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

SNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.15 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSNAVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.481.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.231.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.210.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)65.152.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

SNA vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SNA vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SNA

2.57%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Yield of 2.57% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SNA

43.42%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.42% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSNAVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.57%0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.42%6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SNA

16.89

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

SNA’s P/E Ratio of 16.89 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SNA

3.33

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

SNA’s P/S Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SNA

2.85

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

SNA’s P/B Ratio of 2.85 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SNA vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSNAVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.8959.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.335.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.8515.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.5339.11