SLB vs. WDS: SLB vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both fall under the Energy industry group, but SLB is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while WDS is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.

SLB (SLB) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Profile Item	SLB	WDS
Name	SLB N.V.	Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR
Country/Region	United States	Australia
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Energy Equipment & Services	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-Industry	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services	Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization	73.68 billion USD	40.00 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 31, 1981	November 18, 1996
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

SLB

WDS

GSPC

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Metric	SLB	WDS
Total Return (1Y)	41.53%	30.30%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	1.23%	5.67%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	10.62%	11.65%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

SLB

WDS

GSPC

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

SLB (SLB) is heavily traded at around 12.57M shares per day, whereas Woodside Energy (WDS) sees a more moderate 570.04K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk profile metrics for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Metric	SLB	WDS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	37.07%	33.53%
Beta (5Y)	0.80	0.38
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-46.63%	-48.77%
Avg. Volume (3M)	12.57M	570.04K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

SLB and WDS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Metric	SLB	WDS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.00	0.78
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.59	1.11

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both SLB (SLB) at 11.66% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

SLB

Energy industry group

11.66%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
SLB: 11.66%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

WDS

Energy industry group

7.68%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
WDS: 7.68%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both SLB (SLB) at 8.40% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

SLB

Energy industry group

8.40%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
Median: 10.10%
SLB: 8.40%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

WDS

Energy industry group

22.21%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
WDS: 22.21%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both SLB (SLB) at 14.03% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

SLB

Energy industry group

14.03%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
Median: 18.73%
SLB: 14.03%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

WDS

Energy industry group

23.91%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
WDS: 23.91%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Metric	SLB	WDS
ROE (TTM)	11.66%	7.68%
ROA (TTM)	5.72%	2.83%
Net Margin (TTM)	8.40%	22.21%
Operating Margin (TTM)	14.03%	23.91%
Gross Margin (TTM)	16.59%	34.92%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both SLB (SLB) at -1.60% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both SLB (SLB) at -24.44% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Metric	SLB	WDS
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-1.60%	-1.48%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	8.33%	-8.26%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-24.44%	-24.02%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-0.56%	-30.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both SLB (SLB) at 1.39 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

SLB

Energy industry group

1.39

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
SLB: 1.39
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

WDS

Energy industry group

1.39

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
WDS: 1.39
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both SLB (SLB) at 0.47 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

SLB

Energy industry group

0.47

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
SLB: 0.47
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

WDS

Energy industry group

0.33

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
WDS: 0.33
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Metric	SLB	WDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.39	1.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.47	0.33
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.25	1.15

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while SLB (SLB) at 2.36% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.

SLB

Energy industry group

2.36%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
SLB: 2.36%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

WDS

Energy industry group

5.41%

Max: 8.57%
WDS: 5.41%
Q3: 3.58%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both SLB (SLB) at 56.80% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

SLB

Energy industry group

56.80%

Max: 133.24%
SLB: 56.80%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

WDS

Energy industry group

69.78%

Max: 133.24%
WDS: 69.78%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Metric	SLB	WDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.36%	5.41%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	56.80%	69.78%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while SLB (SLB) at 24.23 sits in the richer quartile — SLB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

SLB

Energy industry group

24.23

Max: 39.54
SLB: 24.23
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

WDS

Energy industry group

13.15

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
WDS: 13.15
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

SLB (SLB) at 2.00 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the pricier quartile — WDS costs more per dollar of sales.

SLB

Energy industry group

2.00

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
SLB: 2.00
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

WDS

Energy industry group

2.89

Max: 5.40
WDS: 2.89
Q3: 2.85
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while SLB (SLB) at 2.83 carries an above-peer premium to book — SLB is pricier on assets.

SLB

Energy industry group

2.83

Max: 4.21
SLB: 2.83
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

WDS

Energy industry group

1.11

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
WDS: 1.11
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

SLB (SLB) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for SLB (SLB) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Metric	SLB	WDS
P/E Ratio (TTM)	24.23	13.15
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.00	2.89
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	2.83	1.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.18%	1.41%