Seek Returns logo

SLB vs. TPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SLB and TPL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSLBTPL
Company NameSchlumberger LimitedTexas Pacific Land Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization49.76 billion USD20.57 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SLB and TPL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SLB vs. TPL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSLBTPL
5-Day Price Return0.42%-1.95%
13-Week Price Return-4.98%-37.00%
26-Week Price Return-20.72%-33.88%
52-Week Price Return-26.46%6.23%
Month-to-Date Return-1.30%-7.58%
Year-to-Date Return-12.99%-19.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.87M0.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume15.28M0.14M
3-Month Volatility30.80%37.32%
Beta1.011.18

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SLB

19.85%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

SLB’s Return on Equity of 19.85% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPL

39.47%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

TPL’s Return on Equity of 39.47% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SLB

11.53%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.53% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TPL

62.16%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

TPL’s Net Profit Margin of 62.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SLB

15.24%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.24% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TPL

75.88%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

TPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 75.88% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSLBTPL
Return on Equity (TTM)19.85%39.47%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.33%35.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.53%62.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.24%75.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.29%94.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SLB

1.31

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPL

14.58

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

TPL’s Current Ratio of 14.58 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SLB

0.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPL

0.00

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, TPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TPL

--

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TPL is currently unavailable.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSLBTPL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.3114.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.9814.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)43.97--

Growth

Revenue Growth

SLB vs. TPL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SLB vs. TPL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SLB

3.11%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.11%, SLB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TPL

1.77%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

TPL’s Dividend Yield of 1.77% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SLB

38.00%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.00% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TPL

79.64%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

TPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.64% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSLBTPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.11%1.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.00%79.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SLB

12.23

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 12.23 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPL

44.90

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

At 44.90, TPL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SLB

1.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPL

27.91

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 27.91, TPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SLB

2.25

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPL

18.84

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

At 18.84, TPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SLB vs. TPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSLBTPL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.2344.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.4127.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.2518.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.4280.59