SHW vs. WPM: Sherwin-Williams vs. Wheaton Precious Metals Stock Comparison
How do Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) both fall under the Materials industry group, but SHW is classified in Chemicals while WPM is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Sherwin-Williams Company | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 83.13 billion USD | 61.91 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | July 6, 2005 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 5.74% | 45.35% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 13.18% | 50.60% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 2.84% | 29.06% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.59% | 52.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 0.49 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.46% | -43.29% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.72M | 2.01M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.05 | 0.79 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.08 | 1.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 23.10% also sits in the top quartile.
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
WPM
Materials industry group
23.10%
- Max
- 52.88%
- WPM
- 23.10%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 60.39% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
WPM
Materials industry group
60.39%
- WPM
- 60.39%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 66.70% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
WPM
Materials industry group
66.70%
- WPM
- 66.70%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 63.70% | 23.10% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.48% | 15.22% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.74% | 60.39% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.56% | 66.70% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 48.60% | 86.61% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 80.18% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for WPM.
EPS Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 177.85% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for WPM.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.06% | 80.18% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.10% | 29.53% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -2.75% | 177.85% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.95% | 29.83% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.57 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
WPM
Materials industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- WPM
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.16 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
WPM
Materials industry group
0.16
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- WPM
- 0.16
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.71 | 0.57 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.72 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.04 | 0.50 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.57% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WPM
Materials industry group
0.57%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- WPM
- 0.57%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 16.29% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WPM
Materials industry group
16.29%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- WPM
- 16.29%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.91% | 0.57% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 29.35% | 16.29% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 29.63 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
WPM
Materials industry group
29.63
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- WPM
- 29.63
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 17.86 clears its benchmark range — WPM looks notably rich on sales.
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
WPM
Materials industry group
17.86
- WPM
- 17.86
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 6.17 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices even higher, above its industry range.
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
WPM
Materials industry group
6.17
- Max
- 6.59
- WPM
- 6.17
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SHW | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.66 | 29.63 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.34 | 17.86 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 20.78 | 6.17 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.98% | -5.11% |