Seek Returns

RTO vs. TRI: Rentokil Initial vs. Thomson Reuters Stock Comparison

How do Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) both fall under the Commercial & Professional Services industry group, but RTO is classified in Commercial Services & Supplies while TRI is classified in Professional Services.

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades as ordinary local shares, while Rentokil Initial (RTO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Profile ItemRTOTRI
NameRentokil Initial plc American Depositary Shares (each representing five Ordinary Shares)Thomson Reuters Corporation
Country/RegionUnited KingdomCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCommercial & Professional ServicesCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesProfessional Services
GICS Sub-IndustryEnvironmental & Facilities ServicesResearch & Consulting Services
Market Capitalization11.87 billion USD48.79 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateNovember 18, 1996June 12, 2002
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

RTO
TRI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricRTOTRI
Total Return (1Y)-10.02%-16.97%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-1.88%-3.77%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-8.85%0.07%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

RTO
TRI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricRTOTRI
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.85%52.25%
Beta (5Y)0.980.73
Max Drawdown (5Y)-50.93%-62.87%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.74M1.62M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
RTO and TRI are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricRTOTRI
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.42-0.41
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.57-0.58

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 5.97% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 14.11% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

5.97%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
Median
14.11%
RTO
5.97%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

14.11%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
TRI
14.11%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 19.69% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 6.70%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

6.70%

Max
23.28%
Q3
11.35%
RTO
6.70%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.69%

Max
23.28%
TRI
19.69%
Q3
11.35%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 21.93% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 12.79%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

12.79%

Max
38.50%
Q3
18.84%
RTO
12.79%
Median
10.40%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

21.93%

Max
38.50%
TRI
21.93%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricRTOTRI
ROE (TTM)5.97%14.11%
ROA (TTM)4.00%6.96%
Net Margin (TTM)6.70%19.69%
Operating Margin (TTM)12.79%21.93%
Gross Margin (TTM)14.01%39.72%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 4.40% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 3.00% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 21.70% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at -31.90% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricRTOTRI
Revenue Growth (YoY)4.40%3.00%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.40%4.10%
EPS Growth (YoY)21.70%-31.90%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)10.00%3.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 1.06 and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 1.08 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.06

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
RTO
1.06
Min
0.45

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.08

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
TRI
1.08
Min
0.45
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 1.11 and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 0.36 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.11

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
RTO
1.11
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.36

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
Median
0.88
TRI
0.36
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricRTOTRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.08
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.110.36
Net Debt / EBITDA2.931.17

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 2.18% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 0.53% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TRI the richer one.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.53%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
RTO
0.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.18%

Max
4.33%
TRI
2.18%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 97.56% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 79.09% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

97.56%

Max
99.58%
RTO
97.56%
Q3
41.99%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

79.09%

Max
99.58%
TRI
79.09%
Q3
41.99%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricRTOTRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.53%2.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)97.56%79.09%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 37.48 and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 34.53 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

37.48

Max
49.47
RTO
37.48
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

34.53

Max
49.47
TRI
34.53
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 1.66 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 6.09 sits in the pricier quartile — TRI costs more per dollar of sales.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.66

Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
RTO
1.66
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

6.09

Max
7.17
TRI
6.09
Q3
3.35
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 2.16 and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 4.35 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.16

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
Median
2.92
RTO
2.16
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

4.35

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
TRI
4.35
Median
2.92
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78
Loading chart…
Rentokil Initial (RTO) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Rentokil Initial (RTO) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricRTOTRI
P/E Ratio (TTM)37.4834.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.666.09
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.164.35
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)8.85%2.27%