Seek Returns logo

RTO vs. TRI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RTO and TRI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TRI is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolRTOTRI
Company NameRentokil Initial plcThomson Reuters Corporation
CountryUnited KingdomCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization13.44 billion USD62.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 18, 1996June 12, 2002
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RTO and TRI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RTO vs. TRI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRTOTRI
5-Day Price Return-1.25%4.24%
13-Week Price Return11.69%-14.58%
26-Week Price Return15.00%-23.32%
52-Week Price Return-0.22%-14.42%
Month-to-Date Return-4.36%-7.82%
Year-to-Date Return0.62%-14.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.19M0.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.74M0.50M
3-Month Volatility25.70%25.49%
Beta1.270.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RTO

6.16%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.86%
Q3
17.95%
Median
10.20%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.69%

RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.16% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TRI

14.44%

Professional Services Industry

Max
50.82%
Q3
32.98%
Median
21.73%
Q1
12.35%
Min
-10.69%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 14.44% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RTO

5.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.54%
Q3
10.35%
Median
5.85%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-2.31%

RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TRI

23.82%

Professional Services Industry

Max
27.86%
Q3
14.27%
Median
7.71%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-9.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 23.82% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RTO

9.99%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
25.57%
Q3
15.63%
Median
8.06%
Q1
4.76%
Min
-7.48%

RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.99% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRI

31.37%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.71%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.30%
Q1
7.86%
Min
-1.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.37% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRTOTRI
Return on Equity (TTM)6.16%14.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.37%9.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.52%23.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.99%31.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--95.37%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RTO

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.94
Q3
2.24
Median
1.28
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRI

0.61

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.69
Median
1.33
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RTO

1.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.11
Median
0.73
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TRI

0.21

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.54
Median
0.94
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RTO

5.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
24.47
Median
9.83
Q1
3.74
Min
-10.97

RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.05
Median
11.35
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRTOTRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.120.61
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.030.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.140.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.2217.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

RTO vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RTO vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RTO

2.38%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.89%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Yield of 2.38% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TRI

1.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.35%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.57%
Q1
0.72%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.62% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RTO

94.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
50.54%
Q1
29.39%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.52% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TRI

58.00%

Professional Services Industry

Max
99.60%
Q3
69.06%
Median
43.41%
Q1
19.44%
Min
0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.00% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRTOTRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.38%1.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)94.52%58.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RTO

39.72

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.06
Q3
35.30
Median
21.86
Q1
16.24
Min
6.18

A P/E Ratio of 39.72 places RTO in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TRI

35.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.91
Q3
32.20
Median
25.00
Q1
17.95
Min
6.60

A P/E Ratio of 35.75 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RTO

2.19

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.55
Q3
3.15
Median
1.07
Q1
0.68
Min
0.06

RTO’s P/S Ratio of 2.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TRI

8.52

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.52
Q3
4.25
Median
2.07
Q1
0.84
Min
0.18

TRI’s P/S Ratio of 8.52 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RTO

2.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.18
Q3
4.19
Median
2.44
Q1
1.61
Min
0.40

RTO’s P/B Ratio of 2.22 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRI

5.90

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.65
Q3
9.28
Median
6.16
Q1
2.96
Min
0.53

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 5.90 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RTO vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRTOTRI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)39.7235.75
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.198.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.225.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.2934.48