RGLD vs. SHW: Royal Gold vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Royal Gold (RGLD) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Royal Gold (RGLD) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but RGLD is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Royal Gold, Inc. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 22.47 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 9, 1981 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.60% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 39.65% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 23.26% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.91% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.39 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -40.73% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 667.01K | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.34 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.00 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Royal Gold (RGLD) at 15.03%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
RGLD
Materials industry group
15.03%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RGLD
- 15.03%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 47.99% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
RGLD
Materials industry group
47.99%
- RGLD
- 47.99%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 65.85% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
RGLD
Materials industry group
65.85%
- Max
- 66.70%
- RGLD
- 65.85%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.03% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.97% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 47.99% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 65.85% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 86.63% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 43.24% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for RGLD.
EPS Growth
Both Royal Gold (RGLD) at 32.74% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 43.24% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.54% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 32.74% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 22.60% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 2.40 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
RGLD
Materials industry group
2.40
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- RGLD
- 2.40
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 0.02 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.
RGLD
Materials industry group
0.02
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- RGLD
- 0.02
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.40 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.02 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.03 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Royal Gold (RGLD) at 0.74% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
RGLD
Materials industry group
0.74%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- RGLD
- 0.74%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Royal Gold (RGLD) at 19.41% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
RGLD
Materials industry group
19.41%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- RGLD
- 19.41%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.74% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 19.41% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Royal Gold (RGLD) at 27.15 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
RGLD
Materials industry group
27.15
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- RGLD
- 27.15
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Royal Gold (RGLD) at 12.86 clears its benchmark range — RGLD looks notably rich on sales.
RGLD
Materials industry group
12.86
- RGLD
- 12.86
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 2.91 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
RGLD
Materials industry group
2.91
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- RGLD
- 2.91
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | RGLD | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 27.15 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 12.86 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.91 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.24% | 2.98% |