REG vs. WY: Regency Centers vs. Weyerhaeuser Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) both fall under the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group, but REG is classified in Retail REITs while WY is classified in Specialized REITs.

Both Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Company profile comparison for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Profile Item	REG	WY
Name	Regency Centers Corporation	Weyerhaeuser Co.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Real Estate	Real Estate
GICS Industry Group	Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)	Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS Industry	Retail REITs	Specialized REITs
GICS Sub-Industry	Retail REITs	Timber REITs
Market Capitalization	13.99 billion USD	15.11 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	October 29, 1993	May 3, 1973
Security Type	REIT	REIT

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

REG

GSPC

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Metric	REG	WY
Total Return (1Y)	12.94%	-5.11%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	12.85%	-7.92%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	4.68%	-7.23%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

REG

GSPC

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Metric	REG	WY
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	16.15%	28.77%
Beta (5Y)	0.79	0.91
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-30.09%	-48.91%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.24M	7.22M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

REG and WY are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Metric	REG	WY
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.54	-0.33
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.82	-0.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Regency Centers (REG) at 7.67% and Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 4.81% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

7.67%

Max: 22.74%
Q3: 10.54%
REG: 7.67%
Median: 6.38%
Q1: 1.69%
Min: -10.86%

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

4.81%

Max: 22.74%
Q3: 10.54%
Median: 6.38%
WY: 4.81%
Q1: 1.69%
Min: -10.86%

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their ROE against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Neither Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Metric	REG	WY
ROE (TTM)	7.67%	4.81%
ROA (TTM)	3.28%	0.84%
Net Margin (TTM)	--	--
Operating Margin (TTM)	--	--
Gross Margin (TTM)	--	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

Regency Centers (REG) at 6.85% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Weyerhaeuser (WY) at -3.07% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Metric	REG	WY
Revenue Growth (YoY)	6.85%	-3.07%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	8.27%	-12.15%
EPS Growth (YoY)	--	--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Regency Centers (REG) at 1.03 and Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 1.82 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.03

Max: 4.19
Q3: 2.11
Median: 1.31
REG: 1.03
Q1: 0.62
Min: 0.06

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.82

Max: 4.19
Q3: 2.11
WY: 1.82
Median: 1.31
Q1: 0.62
Min: 0.06

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their current ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 0.57 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Regency Centers (REG) at 0.72 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

0.72

Max: 2.72
Q3: 1.59
Median: 0.99
REG: 0.72
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.20

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

0.57

Max: 2.72
Q3: 1.59
Median: 0.99
Q1: 0.72
WY: 0.57
Min: 0.20

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Metric	REG	WY
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.03	1.82
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.72	0.57
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.54	6.85

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Regency Centers (REG) at 3.96% and Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 3.88% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

3.96%

Max: 8.62%
Q3: 5.95%
Median: 4.34%
REG: 3.96%
Q1: 3.26%
Min: 0.00%

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

3.88%

Max: 8.62%
Q3: 5.95%
Median: 4.34%
WY: 3.88%
Q1: 3.26%
Min: 0.00%

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Metric	REG	WY
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.96%	3.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	--	--

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 2.16 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Regency Centers (REG) at 8.15 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

8.15

Max: 14.47
REG: 8.15
Q3: 8.02
Median: 5.98
Q1: 3.27
Min: 0.43

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

2.16

Max: 14.47
Q3: 8.02
Median: 5.98
Q1: 3.27
WY: 2.16
Min: 0.43

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Regency Centers (REG) at 2.08 and Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 1.61 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

2.08

Max: 4.06
Q3: 2.53
REG: 2.08
Median: 1.64
Q1: 1.06
Min: 0.21

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.61

Max: 4.06
Q3: 2.53
Median: 1.64
WY: 1.61
Q1: 1.06
Min: 0.21

Regency Centers (REG) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Regency Centers (REG) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Metric	REG	WY
P/E Ratio (TTM)	--	--
P/S Ratio (TTM)	8.15	2.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	2.08	1.61
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	--	--