Seek Returns logo

RACE vs. W: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RACE and W, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRACEW
Company NameFerrari N.V.Wayfair Inc.
CountryItalyUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesSpecialty Retail
Market Capitalization83.48 billion USD10.37 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 21, 2015October 2, 2014
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RACE and W by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RACE vs. W: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRACEW
5-Day Price Return6.15%1.15%
13-Week Price Return-8.16%106.83%
26-Week Price Return-12.25%68.02%
52-Week Price Return-3.29%81.40%
Month-to-Date Return5.22%21.82%
Year-to-Date Return-1.70%80.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.34M4.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M5.10M
3-Month Volatility31.96%54.62%
Beta1.013.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RACE

45.61%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

RACE’s Return on Equity of 45.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

W

-659.94%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

W has a negative Return on Equity of -659.94%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RACE

22.91%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

RACE’s Net Profit Margin of 22.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

W

-2.50%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

W has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RACE

29.16%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

RACE’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

W

-1.97%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

W has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.97%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRACEW
Return on Equity (TTM)45.61%-659.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.76%-8.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.91%-2.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.16%-1.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.20%30.27%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RACE

2.08

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

RACE’s Current Ratio of 2.08 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

W

0.82

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

W’s Current Ratio of 0.82 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RACE

0.89

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

RACE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

W

136.90

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 136.90, W operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialty Retail industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RACE

181.49

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 181.49, RACE demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

W

-15.62

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

W has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.62. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRACEW
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.080.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.610.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.89136.90
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)181.49-15.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

RACE vs. W: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RACE vs. W: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RACE

0.67%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

W

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

W currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RACE

44.33%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.33% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

W

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

W has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRACEW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.33%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RACE

48.99

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 48.99, RACE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

W

--

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

P/E Ratio data for W is currently unavailable.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RACE

11.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.23, RACE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

W

0.85

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

W’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RACE

22.78

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 22.78, RACE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

W

1,989.32

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

At 1,989.32, W’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RACE vs. W: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRACEW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.99--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.230.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.781,989.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)57.4730.83