Seek Returns logo

QBTS vs. TEAM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at QBTS and TEAM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolQBTSTEAM
Company NameD-Wave Quantum Inc.Atlassian Corporation
CountryUnited StatesAustralia
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSoftware
Market Capitalization10.28 billion USD41.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 11, 2020December 9, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of QBTS and TEAM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

QBTS vs. TEAM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolQBTSTEAM
5-Day Price Return-1.24%-3.56%
13-Week Price Return69.08%-0.09%
26-Week Price Return326.27%-22.64%
52-Week Price Return1,911.64%-31.98%
Month-to-Date Return-20.75%-6.07%
Year-to-Date Return249.64%-34.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume44.52M3.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume50.70M2.74M
3-Month Volatility113.21%43.75%
Beta1.550.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

QBTS

--

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

Return on Equity data for QBTS is currently unavailable.

TEAM

-13.91%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -13.91%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

QBTS

-1,263.92%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

QBTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1,263.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TEAM

-3.38%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.38%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

QBTS

-353.14%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

QBTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -353.14%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TEAM

-3.57%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.57%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolQBTSTEAM
Return on Equity (TTM)---13.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)-82.90%-3.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1,263.92%-3.38%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-353.14%-3.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.46%82.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

QBTS

20.73

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

QBTS’s Current Ratio of 20.73 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TEAM

1.26

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

QBTS

0.15

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

QBTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEAM

0.72

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

TEAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

QBTS

-46.22

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

QBTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.22. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TEAM

-11.02

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

TEAM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolQBTSTEAM
Current Ratio (MRQ)20.731.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)20.441.15
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-46.22-11.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

QBTS vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

QBTS vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

QBTS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

QBTS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolQBTSTEAM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

QBTS

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for QBTS is currently unavailable.

TEAM

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for TEAM is currently unavailable.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

QBTS

461.64

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

With a P/S Ratio of 461.64, QBTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TEAM

7.70

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 7.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

QBTS

10.68

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

QBTS’s P/B Ratio of 10.68 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEAM

30.49

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

TEAM’s P/B Ratio of 30.49 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

QBTS vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolQBTSTEAM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)461.647.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.6830.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--28.87