PSO vs. QSR: Pearson vs. Restaurant Brands Stock Comparison
How do Pearson (PSO) and Restaurant Brands (QSR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Pearson (PSO) and Restaurant Brands (QSR) both fall under the Consumer Services industry group, but PSO is classified in Diversified Consumer Services while QSR is classified in Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure.
Restaurant Brands (QSR) trades as ordinary local shares, while Pearson (PSO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Pearson plc Sponsored ADR | Restaurant Brands International Inc. |
| Country/Region | United Kingdom | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Diversified Consumer Services | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Education Services | Restaurants |
| Market Capitalization | 10.38 billion USD | 35.56 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 18, 1996 | December 11, 2014 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 34.42% | 19.01% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.38% | 7.95% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.99% | 9.80% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.07% | 24.79% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.54 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -30.73% | -24.53% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 698.84K | 2.91M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.20 | 0.59 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.67 | 0.89 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 39.05% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Pearson (PSO) at 9.16% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for QSR.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
9.16%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- PSO
- 9.16%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
39.05%
- Max
- 76.75%
- QSR
- 39.05%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 15.35% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Pearson (PSO) at 8.78%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
8.78%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- PSO
- 8.78%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
15.35%
- Max
- 25.52%
- QSR
- 15.35%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 27.92% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Pearson (PSO) at 13.32%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
13.32%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- PSO
- 13.32%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
27.92%
- Max
- 49.05%
- QSR
- 27.92%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 9.16% | 39.05% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.09% | 6.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.78% | 15.35% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.32% | 27.92% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 52.04% | 34.33% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 12.23% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Pearson (PSO) at 0.70% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Pearson (PSO) at -20.16% and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at -26.10% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.70% | 12.23% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.35% | 13.19% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -20.16% | -26.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.86% | -10.24% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 0.96 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pearson (PSO) at 2.00 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
2.00
- Max
- 3.41
- PSO
- 2.00
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
0.96
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- QSR
- 0.96
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Pearson (PSO) at 0.52 and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 2.84 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
0.52
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- PSO
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
2.84
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- QSR
- 2.84
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.00 | 0.96 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 2.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.35 | 4.98 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 3.27% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Pearson (PSO) at 1.46% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, QSR the richer one.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
1.46%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- PSO
- 1.46%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
3.27%
- Max
- 4.10%
- QSR
- 3.27%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Pearson (PSO) at 51.09% and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 56.48% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
51.09%
- Max
- 89.80%
- PSO
- 51.09%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
56.48%
- Max
- 89.80%
- QSR
- 56.48%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.46% | 3.27% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 51.09% | 56.48% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Pearson (PSO) at 25.78 and Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 17.07 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
25.78
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- PSO
- 25.78
- Median
- 21.88
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
17.07
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- QSR
- 17.07
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Pearson (PSO) at 2.86 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 3.64 sits in the pricier quartile — QSR costs more per dollar of sales.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
2.86
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- PSO
- 2.86
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
3.64
- Max
- 6.40
- QSR
- 3.64
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Pearson (PSO) at 2.38 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Restaurant Brands (QSR) at 6.87 carries an above-peer premium to book — QSR is pricier on assets.
PSO
Consumer Services industry group
2.38
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- PSO
- 2.38
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
QSR
Consumer Services industry group
6.87
- Max
- 12.02
- QSR
- 6.87
- Q3
- 5.58
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PSO | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 25.78 | 17.07 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.86 | 3.64 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.38 | 6.87 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 8.08% | 4.48% |