PNFP vs. UMBF: Pinnacle Financial Partners vs. UMB Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) and UMB Financial (UMBF) are both classified in the Regional Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 9.56% and UMB Financial (UMBF) at 13.50% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

UMB Financial (UMBF) at 35.61% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 25.54% keeps a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) in Banks and UMB Financial (UMBF) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

UMB Financial (UMBF) at 65.66% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 17.76%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 35.40% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while UMB Financial (UMBF) at 3.34% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) in Banks and UMB Financial (UMBF) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) in Banks and UMB Financial (UMBF) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 1.72% and UMB Financial (UMBF) at 1.33% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 23.29% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; UMB Financial (UMBF) at 13.54% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

UMB Financial (UMBF) at 10.12 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 13.47 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for UMBF, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) in Banks and UMB Financial (UMBF) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 1.10 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while UMB Financial (UMBF) at 1.34 is valued near its industry’s middle — PNFP is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics