PLTR vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at PLTR and WFC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	PLTR	WFC
Company Name	Palantir Technologies Inc.	Wells Fargo & Company
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Financials
GICS Industry	Software	Banks
Market Capitalization	372.86 billion USD	256.88 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	September 30, 2020	June 1, 1972
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PLTR and WFC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PLTR vs. WFC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	PLTR	WFC
5-Day Price Return	-0.37%	3.43%
13-Week Price Return	28.52%	9.27%
26-Week Price Return	40.26%	-0.20%
52-Week Price Return	392.39%	43.30%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.75%	-0.55%
Year-to-Date Return	107.81%	14.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume	92.56M	12.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume	83.69M	16.68M
3-Month Volatility	50.24%	23.69%
Beta	2.63	1.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PLTR

14.64%

Software Industry

Max: 59.01%
Q3: 21.98%
Median: 7.15%
Q1: -11.12%
Min: -51.24%

PLTR’s Return on Equity of 14.64% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WFC

11.36%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

WFC’s Return on Equity of 11.36% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PLTR

22.18%

Software Industry

Max: 48.14%
Q3: 18.23%
Median: 5.60%
Q1: -9.22%
Min: -49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.18% places PLTR in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WFC

22.19%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WFC’s Net Profit Margin of 22.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PLTR

16.55%

Software Industry

Max: 57.34%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 7.84%
Q1: -8.72%
Min: -51.37%

PLTR’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.55% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WFC

25.35%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

WFC’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.35% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	PLTR	WFC
Return on Equity (TTM)	14.64%	11.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)	11.65%	1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	22.18%	22.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	16.55%	25.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	80.03%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PLTR

6.32

Software Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.31
Median: 1.45
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.24

PLTR’s Current Ratio of 6.32 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

WFC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PLTR

0.00

Software Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

PLTR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WFC

2.01

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PLTR

-1.53

Software Industry

Max: 67.02
Q3: 19.86
Median: 0.70
Q1: -12.50
Min: -53.00

PLTR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.53. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

WFC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	PLTR	WFC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	6.32	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	6.19	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	2.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-1.53	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

PLTR vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PLTR vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PLTR

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.08%
Q3: 0.03%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PLTR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WFC

2.53%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PLTR

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 1.32%
Q3: 0.53%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PLTR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WFC

31.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.00% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	PLTR	WFC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	31.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PLTR

485.17

Software Industry

Max: 149.35
Q3: 100.21
Median: 47.97
Q1: 26.77
Min: 11.68

At 485.17, PLTR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Software industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

WFC

12.27

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

WFC’s P/E Ratio of 12.27 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PLTR

107.63

Software Industry

Max: 25.24
Q3: 13.52
Median: 8.15
Q1: 4.87
Min: 0.98

With a P/S Ratio of 107.63, PLTR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

WFC

1.91

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PLTR

54.26

Software Industry

Max: 30.95
Q3: 14.91
Median: 7.75
Q1: 3.60
Min: 0.38

At 54.26, PLTR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WFC

1.42

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

WFC’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PLTR vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	PLTR	WFC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	485.17	12.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	107.63	1.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	54.26	1.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	216.73	16.66