Seek Returns logo

PHI vs. TLK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PHI and TLK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both PHI and TLK are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolPHITLK
Company NamePLDT Inc.Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
CountryPhilippinesIndonesia
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryWireless Telecommunication ServicesDiversified Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization4.98 billion USD20.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 3, 1973November 14, 1995
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PHI and TLK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PHI vs. TLK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPHITLK
5-Day Price Return-0.83%13.90%
13-Week Price Return3.48%25.37%
26-Week Price Return0.00%26.32%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%-9.32%
Month-to-Date Return-0.53%16.67%
Year-to-Date Return1.16%23.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.08M146.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.10M117.79M
3-Month Volatility19.87%34.08%
Beta0.491.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PHI

27.67%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

In the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, PHI’s Return on Equity of 27.67% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TLK

16.39%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
35.96%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.29%
Q1
-0.99%
Min
-18.19%

In the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, TLK’s Return on Equity of 16.39% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PHI

14.46%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.46% places PHI in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TLK

15.48%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
28.40%
Q3
13.05%
Median
6.85%
Q1
-0.81%
Min
-18.76%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.48% places TLK in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PHI

24.42%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.42% places PHI in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TLK

27.94%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
37.46%
Q3
22.24%
Median
15.73%
Q1
9.79%
Min
2.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.94% places TLK in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPHITLK
Return on Equity (TTM)27.67%16.39%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.05%7.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.46%15.48%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.42%27.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)86.73%66.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PHI

0.36

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

PHI’s Current Ratio of 0.36 falls into the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TLK

0.71

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.63
Q3
1.14
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.16

TLK’s Current Ratio of 0.71 aligns with the median group of the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PHI

2.92

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

PHI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.92. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TLK

0.64

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.06
Median
1.32
Q1
0.74
Min
0.11

Falling into the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, TLK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PHI

4.71

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

PHI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TLK

12.14

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
14.66
Q3
8.25
Median
3.53
Q1
1.47
Min
-2.60

TLK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.14 is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPHITLK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.360.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.290.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.920.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.7112.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

PHI vs. TLK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PHI vs. TLK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PHI

7.31%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.31%, PHI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TLK

6.68%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
10.34%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.89%
Q1
1.73%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.68%, TLK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PHI

65.96%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

PHI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.96% is within the typical range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TLK

407.49%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
270.06%
Q3
135.21%
Median
76.62%
Q1
35.06%
Min
0.00%

At 407.49%, TLK’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPHITLK
Dividend Yield (TTM)7.31%6.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)65.96%407.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PHI

9.02

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

In the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, PHI’s P/E Ratio of 9.02 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TLK

13.78

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
33.39
Q3
23.91
Median
16.72
Q1
13.00
Min
4.13

TLK’s P/E Ratio of 13.78 is within the middle range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PHI

1.30

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

PHI’s P/S Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TLK

2.13

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.60
Median
1.62
Q1
0.94
Min
0.35

TLK’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PHI

2.37

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

PHI’s P/B Ratio of 2.37 is within the conventional range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TLK

2.09

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
3.45
Median
2.10
Q1
1.19
Min
0.32

TLK’s P/B Ratio of 2.09 is within the conventional range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PHI vs. TLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPHITLK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.0213.78
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.302.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.372.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.448.86