PHG vs. UHS: Koninklijke Philips vs. Universal Health Services Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) and Universal Health Services (UHS) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but PHG is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies while UHS is classified in Health Care Providers & Services.

Universal Health Services (UHS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 19.74% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 8.61% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for UHS.

Both Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 5.39% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 7.97% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 3.76% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 9.60% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 9.71% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at -1.04% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Universal Health Services (UHS) reports EPS growth of 37.34%, ranked against its industry; Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 1.37 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.33 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PHG.

Both Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 0.70 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.80 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Universal Health Services (UHS) reports a yield of 0.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 211.79%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Universal Health Services (UHS) reports 3.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 8.18 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 63.23 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.63 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.67 prices around its industry’s middle — UHS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 1.51 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 2.28 is valued near its industry’s middle — UHS is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics