Seek Returns logo

PHG vs. UHS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PHG and UHS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PHG trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with access to a foreign company, while UHS is a standard domestic stock.

SymbolPHGUHS
Company NameKoninklijke Philips N.V.Universal Health Services, Inc.
CountryNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization26.34 billion USD11.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980July 9, 1981
Security TypeNY Reg ShrsCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PHG and UHS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PHG vs. UHS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPHGUHS
5-Day Price Return-0.13%-0.84%
13-Week Price Return17.36%-5.20%
26-Week Price Return-1.85%1.32%
52-Week Price Return-12.31%-21.73%
Month-to-Date Return3.29%9.59%
Year-to-Date Return-2.21%1.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.30M0.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.84M0.89M
3-Month Volatility27.57%31.16%
Beta1.061.30

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PHG

-0.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

PHG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

UHS

18.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UHS’s Return on Equity of 18.62% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PHG

0.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Net Profit Margin of 0.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UHS

7.66%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.66% places UHS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PHG

6.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

PHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.11% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UHS

10.99%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

An Operating Profit Margin of 10.99% places UHS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPHGUHS
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.18%18.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.08%8.60%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.90%7.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.11%10.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.85%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

PHG’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UHS

1.29

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

UHS’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PHG

0.81

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PHG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UHS

0.65

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

UHS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PHG

1.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

UHS

9.05

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

UHS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.05 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPHGUHS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.261.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.811.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.810.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.419.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

PHG vs. UHS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PHG vs. UHS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PHG

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UHS

0.45%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UHS’s Dividend Yield of 0.45% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PHG

0.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UHS

4.19%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UHS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.19% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPHGUHS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.42%4.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PHG

140.05

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

At 140.05, PHG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UHS

9.33

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UHS’s P/E Ratio of 9.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s P/S Ratio of 1.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

UHS

0.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

UHS’s P/S Ratio of 0.71 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PHG

1.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

PHG’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UHS

1.66

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

UHS’s P/B Ratio of 1.66 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PHG vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPHGUHS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)140.059.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.260.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.891.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.6613.05