Seek Returns logo

PG vs. TSM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PG and TSM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PG is a standard domestic listing, while TSM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolPGTSM
Company NameThe Procter & Gamble CompanyTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
CountryUnited StatesTaiwan
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization373.63 billion USD1,185.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 9, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PG and TSM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PG vs. TSM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPGTSM
5-Day Price Return3.75%-3.40%
13-Week Price Return-3.19%14.65%
26-Week Price Return-6.73%4.13%
52-Week Price Return-5.29%17.52%
Month-to-Date Return6.01%-2.16%
Year-to-Date Return-4.86%5.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.01M37.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.20M34.71M
3-Month Volatility14.84%26.30%
Beta0.371.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TSM

33.51%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, TSM’s Return on Equity of 33.51% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TSM

42.92%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 42.92% places TSM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

TSM

48.71%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.71% places TSM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPGTSM
Return on Equity (TTM)30.78%33.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.85%21.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.95%42.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.32%48.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.34%58.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TSM

2.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

TSM’s Current Ratio of 2.37 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSM

0.21

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

TSM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TSM

8.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

TSM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.32 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPGTSM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.702.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.442.15
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.660.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)47.048.32

Growth

Revenue Growth

PG vs. TSM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PG vs. TSM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PG

2.64%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.64% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TSM

1.35%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSM’s Dividend Yield of 1.35% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TSM

28.42%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPGTSM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.64%1.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.80%28.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PG

23.40

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 23.40 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TSM

21.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, TSM’s P/E Ratio of 21.05 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PG

4.43

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TSM

9.04

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

TSM’s P/S Ratio of 9.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TSM

6.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

TSM’s P/B Ratio of 6.00 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PG vs. TSM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPGTSM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.4021.05
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.439.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.146.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.6132.90