PAYP vs. SPGI: PayPay vs. S&P Global Stock Comparison

Company Profile

PayPay (PAYP) and S&P Global (SPGI) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but PAYP is classified in Financial Services while SPGI is classified in Capital Markets.

S&P Global (SPGI) has been public since February 21, 1973, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while PayPay (PAYP) listed only on March 12, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

S&P Global (SPGI) trades as ordinary local shares, while PayPay (PAYP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both PAYP and SPGI need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both PayPay (PAYP) at 18.80% and S&P Global (SPGI) at 17.88% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

S&P Global (SPGI) at 30.60% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of PayPay (PAYP) at 15.85%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both PayPay (PAYP) at 32.79% and S&P Global (SPGI) at 48.21% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both PayPay (PAYP) at 25.85% and S&P Global (SPGI) at 7.94% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

PayPay (PAYP) at 230.06% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than S&P Global (SPGI) at 18.70%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services and S&P Global (SPGI) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services and S&P Global (SPGI) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile S&P Global (SPGI) reports a yield of 0.82%, ranking against industry peers normally.

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile S&P Global (SPGI) reports a payout of 22.06%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

PayPay (PAYP) at 23.30 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while S&P Global (SPGI) at 27.95 sits in the richer quartile — SPGI needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

PayPay (PAYP) at 0.02 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while S&P Global (SPGI) at 8.32 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

Both PayPay (PAYP) at 3.75 and S&P Global (SPGI) at 6.88 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics